1) What are the risks of allowing students to work solely in their levels of competence without challenging them to attempt difficult tasks or concepts.
2) The author states, "It is not reasonable to hold a student accountable for information presented solely in narrative he cannot read." Do you agree with that statement? Why or why not? List strategies that could be used with a struggling learner other than just admonishing him to reread the text.
3) There are educators who argue that the ability to read is the cornerstone for every other subject taught in school, so students who cannot read the required text or the assessment instruments should not be able to move forward until they can. Others believe that teachers should offer content knowledge in a myriad of methods so that students progress in their various subject areas while they are honing their reading skills. Where do you stand on this issue? Defend your answer.
PS...Please make sure your Blogger ID has you name in it...that way I can make sure I award PGP points to the correct person..thank you so very much!
Additional Resources:
Zone of Proximal Development
6 Scaffolding Strategies to Use With Your Students